Scout a player
Who are you playing?
Every list they published, the decks they repeat, and how each one went. All seven formats at once.
Type a handle in the search box at the top of the page.
Most active this month
- LucasG1ggs 54 lists
- VitorCarvalho01 54 lists
- musasabi 42 lists
- MisterTwin 39 lists
- Arianne 37 lists
Hardest to guess
- ejk 15 decks
- LucasG1ggs 13 decks
- VitorCarvalho01 13 decks
- musasabi 13 decks
- MisterTwin 13 decks
Formats busiest first, three biggest decks each, paper and MTGO together
- Broodscale Combo 14.8% share Same place +1.6
- Izzet Prowess 9.5% share Same place −1.2
- Izzet Affinity 5.3% share Up 2 places ±0.0
- 70.4%everything else, 56 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Mono-Red Madness 11.9% share Same place −4.9
- Mono-Blue Terror 6.7% share Same place −3.3
- Mono-Green Elves 6.4% share Up 1 place +1.2
- 74.9%everything else, 47 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Mono-Green Landfall 10.5% share Up 1 place −2.5
- Dimir Midrange 9.9% share Up 2 places +0.9
- Orzhov Lifegain 9.1% share Up 5 places +5.4
- 70.5%everything else, 32 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Hogaak Moonshadow 7.3% share Up 17 places +5.4
- Boros Energy 6.6% share Same place −0.3
- Dimir Moonshadow 5.4% share Same place −1.4
- 80.7%everything else, 42 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Lurrus PO 13.9% share Up 2 places +3.6
- Jewel Shops 12.4% share Up 4 places +4.0
- Mono-White Initiative 9.6% share Down 2 places −3.7
- 64.1%everything else, 14 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Mono-Blue Stiflenought 13.9% share Up 1 place −1.4
- Selesnya Enchantress 11.6% share Down 1 place −5.1
- Naya Terragedon 10.9% share Same place +0.4
- 63.6%everything else, 14 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Izzet Prowess 11.8% share Up 1 place −0.8
- Mono-Red Prowess 10.8% share Up 1 place +2.1
- Golgari Midrange 9.9% share Down 2 places −3.7
- 67.6%everything else, 30 named decks and the unclassified lists
Method
Share is share of published lists, not of the field. It counts every list published for that format in the 30 days to 24 Oct 2026, on paper and on MTGO. Each list counts once. League 5-0 lists count in these shares. Lists we could not name are counted in the total. They sit in the part the band does not show.
A League publishes lists but no match data. These bands do not show win rates, so they do not need match data. The metagame pages use the same list population.
The movement chip has two parts. The triangle is places gained or lost against the 30 days before, that is 26 Aug 2026 to 24 Sep 2026. The number after it is the change in share points. Places are counted over every named deck in that format, not over the three shown here, so a deck can lose a place while its own share holds.
Formats are ordered by how many decklists they published in the same 30 days, paper and MTGO together. A big paper event can move a format up for a month. The order changes when the games do.
In each band the three crops are sized against each other, not against the format. The real share is the number printed on each crop, and the hatched cell on the right is everything the band does not show.
Each format shows up to three events: the two most recent ones with a final ranking, plus the most recent League. A ranked event can be a paper event or an MTGO event. On a League row the winning deck is the archetype published most that day, the record reads 5-0, and no player is named. "Deck not named yet" means a row has no deck we can name: the winner published no list, or the lists matched no deck we know.
The two player lists count MTGO players only. They count every list published in the same 30 days, Leagues included. They say how busy a player was, which is a fact about the player and not about the size of a deck's field.
No win rate is printed here. Over 30 days no named deck sits far enough from the field average to call it better or worse. Each deck's own page has room to show the range around that number, so it is printed there.