Scout a player
Who are you playing?
Every list they published, the decks they repeat, and how each one went. All seven formats at once.
Type a handle in the search box at the top of the page.
Most active this month
- LucasG1ggs 41 lists
- musasabi 38 lists
- VitorCarvalho01 38 lists
- Capitano_CL 37 lists
- Arianne 34 lists
Hardest to guess
- LucasG1ggs 21 decks
- ejk 21 decks
- _Batutinha_ 13 decks
- pokerswizard 12 decks
- fazparte 11 decks
Formats busiest first, three biggest decks each
- Broodscale Combo 8.9% share Up 2 places +1.7
- Izzet Prowess 8.7% share Up 3 places +3.9
- Esper Blink 8.1% share Up 13 places +5.9
- 74.3%everything else, 50 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Mono-Red Madness 15.0% share Same place +5.3
- Mono-Blue Terror 12.3% share Same place +3.8
- Green Tron 7.0% share Up 10 places +3.4
- 65.8%everything else, 37 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Mono-Blue Tron 8.0% share New this window +8.0
- Boros Energy 7.0% share Up 4 places +2.4
- Dimir Moonshadow 7.0% share New this window +7.0
- 78.0%everything else, 41 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Mono-Green Landfall 20.3% share Up 4 places +11.9
- Izzet Spellementals 11.1% share Up 2 places +2.5
- Dimir Midrange 10.5% share Up 9 places +9.4
- 58.0%everything else, 31 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Izzet Prowess 17.2% share Same place +0.6
- Golgari Midrange 13.1% share Same place +1.5
- Abzan Greasefang 9.6% share Same place +0.5
- 60.1%everything else, 32 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Raker Shops 13.3% share Same place −9.1
- Dimir Lurrus Control 11.6% share Up 6 places +6.6
- Mono-White Initiative 10.4% share Down 1 place −2.7
- 64.7%everything else, 14 named decks and the unclassified lists
- Mono-Blue Stiflenought 17.8% share Same place −3.9
- Selesnya Enchantress 16.2% share Up 1 place +4.9
- Mono-Red Sligh 8.8% share Down 1 place −2.8
- 57.2%everything else, 13 named decks and the unclassified lists
Method
Share is share of published lists, not of the field. It counts every list published for that format in the 30 days to 9 Sep 2026. League 5-0 lists count in these shares. Lists we could not name are counted in the total. They sit in the part the band does not show.
A League publishes lists but no match data. These bands do not show win rates, so they do not need match data. The metagame pages use the same list population.
The movement chip has two parts. The triangle is places gained or lost against the 30 days before, that is 12 Jul 2026 to 10 Aug 2026. The number after it is the change in share points. Places are counted over every named deck in that format, not over the three shown here, so a deck can lose a place while its own share holds.
Formats are ordered by how many decklists they published in the same 30 days. The order changes when the games do.
In each band the three crops are sized against each other, not against the format. The real share is the number printed on each crop, and the hatched cell on the right is everything the band does not show.
Each format shows up to three events: the two most recent ones with a final ranking, plus the most recent League. On a League row the winning deck is the archetype published most that day, the record reads 5-0, and no player is named. "Deck not named yet" means a row has no deck we can name: the winner published no list, or the lists matched no deck we know.
The two player lists count every list published in the same 30 days, Leagues included. They say how busy a player was, which is a fact about the player and not about the size of a deck's field.
No win rate is printed here. Over 30 days no named deck sits far enough from the field average to call it better or worse. Each deck's own page has room to show the range around that number, so it is printed there.